How We Think About Arcade Development
Our approach comes from years of working with operators across different markets, learning what creates lasting value beyond initial deployment.
Back to HomeOur Foundation
Shimmer was built on the understanding that arcade development requires specialized knowledge often missing from general game studios. We focus on creating solutions that work reliably in real operational contexts, not just in ideal test environments. Our values reflect what we've learned from operators about what actually matters when systems go live.
Practical Excellence
Technical sophistication means nothing if solutions don't work in actual venues. We measure success by operational reliability.
Regional Respect
Different markets approach arcade entertainment differently. We build with this awareness rather than assuming universal preferences.
Operator Partnership
We view operators as partners with valuable operational knowledge, not just clients receiving technical services.
Philosophy and Vision
We believe arcade games serve important social and entertainment functions in their communities. Development should honor this role by creating experiences that work reliably and respect the people who play them and operate them.
Technology Serves Experience
Technical capabilities matter only insofar as they create better experiences for players or more sustainable operations for venues. We resist adding technical complexity for its own sake, instead focusing on what genuinely improves outcomes. This sometimes means choosing simpler solutions that work reliably over impressive features that create maintenance burdens.
Our network systems exemplify this philosophy. Rather than maximizing features, we prioritize graceful degradation when connections fail, ensuring games remain playable during the network issues common in arcade environments. The sophisticated part is making this reliability appear simple to operators and invisible to players.
Understanding Through Listening
Each operator's business operates within unique constraints and opportunities. Cookie-cutter solutions rarely address their actual needs effectively. We invest time understanding specific contexts before proposing approaches, recognizing that what works in Tokyo might need adjustment for Jakarta or Seoul.
This extends beyond business requirements to player behavior patterns. Asian markets show diverse preferences for game pacing, social features, and competitive elements. Building with this diversity in mind from the start creates more adaptable solutions than trying to modify Western-designed games for regional markets after development.
Sustainable by Design
Arcade games often run for years, not months. We design for this reality from the beginning, considering how systems will be maintained, updated, and operated over extended periods. This influences everything from code architecture to documentation approach to training materials.
Sustainability also means building systems that operators can understand and manage with their existing staff. Complex solutions that require constant developer intervention create ongoing dependencies that become increasingly expensive. We prefer approaches that empower operators to handle routine tasks independently.
Core Beliefs
Context Shapes Solutions
The ideal technical approach depends entirely on deployment context. Network quality, venue type, player demographics, and business model all influence what works. We adapt our methods to these realities rather than forcing predetermined solutions.
Reliability Over Features
Players and operators need games that work consistently. A system with fewer features that runs reliably serves everyone better than impressive capabilities that create frequent issues. We make this trade-off deliberately.
Data Informs Decisions
We build analytics that actually help operators understand their business. This means focusing on actionable metrics rather than comprehensive data collection. The goal is insight that guides decisions, not dashboards that impress.
Cultural Sensitivity Matters
Game design elements that work in one market may translate poorly to others. We consider cultural context in everything from competitive structures to visual design to social features, avoiding assumptions about universal appeal.
Principles in Practice
Our beliefs translate into specific practices throughout the development process.
Early Operator Involvement
We involve operators in design decisions from project start, not just at review milestones. Their operational knowledge often reveals considerations that purely technical teams miss. This collaborative approach creates solutions that actually work for their specific contexts rather than requiring extensive post-development adjustments.
Real-World Testing Environments
We test in conditions that mirror actual deployment scenarios, including variable network quality, diverse hardware configurations, and peak usage loads. Lab testing under ideal conditions doesn't reveal the issues that emerge in real venues. This approach takes more time during development but prevents problems in operation.
Documentation for Operations Teams
We write documentation for the people who will actually use systems, not just for developers. This means focusing on operational tasks, troubleshooting common issues, and explaining maintenance procedures in accessible language. Good documentation reduces dependence on external support for routine matters.
Iterative Regional Adaptation
When adapting games for different markets, we work with local operators to understand nuances rather than making assumptions. Small details like pacing preferences, competitive intensity, or social feature usage patterns can significantly impact reception. We adjust based on actual feedback from target markets.
The Human-Centered Approach
Technology choices should serve the people using systems, not the other way around.
For Players
Games should be engaging without being exploitative, challenging without being frustrating, and social without being intimidating. We design for genuine enjoyment rather than maximizing engagement metrics that might compromise experience quality. This philosophy influences everything from difficulty curves to monetization approaches.
Different markets have different expectations about what makes games enjoyable. Japanese players might prefer different competitive structures than Southeast Asian players. We build flexibility into core systems so games can be tuned for regional preferences without fundamental redesigns.
For Operators
Arcade operators run businesses with real financial constraints and operational challenges. Our systems respect this reality by being maintainable with existing staff, providing clear performance data, and avoiding vendor lock-in where possible. We want operators to feel capable of managing their systems, not dependent on us for routine tasks.
This extends to how we structure ongoing relationships. We provide support that helps operators become more independent over time rather than creating dependencies that benefit us financially but burden them operationally.
Innovation Through Intention
We pursue innovation that solves real problems, not novelty for its own sake.
Learning from Deployments
Each project teaches us something about what works in actual operation versus what looks promising during development. We systematically capture these lessons and apply them to future work. This continuous learning process is how we've developed our current understanding of arcade-specific challenges and effective solutions.
Selective Technology Adoption
New technologies offer genuine benefits when they solve existing problems better than current approaches. We adopt new tools and methods based on this standard rather than staying current with trends. Sometimes this means using established technology that works reliably instead of newer options with impressive capabilities but operational uncertainties.
Evolving Best Practices
What constitutes best practice in arcade development changes as markets evolve, technology improves, and we learn from experience. We regularly review our methods to identify what should change. This willingness to evolve our own approaches prevents us from becoming stuck in outdated practices.
Integrity and Transparency
Honest About Limitations
We acknowledge when projects push beyond our current capabilities or when requests might be better served by different specialists. Pretending we can handle everything well serves no one's interests. This honesty extends to realistic timeline and outcome expectations during project planning.
Clear Communication
Technical work involves uncertainties and discoveries that emerge during development. We communicate these honestly rather than waiting until they become problems. When issues arise, we explain what happened, why it matters, and what we're doing about it. This transparency helps operators make informed decisions about their projects.
Aligned Incentives
Our success depends on creating solutions that work well for operators over time, not just completing projects. This alignment means we care about long-term outcomes as much as immediate deliverables. When we recommend certain approaches, it's because we genuinely believe they serve the operator's interests, not because they maximize our revenue.
Long-Term Thinking
Arcade games often operate for years. Our development approach accounts for this reality.
Maintainable Architecture
We structure code and systems for future maintenance, not just initial deployment. This means clear organization, thorough documentation, and avoiding shortcuts that create technical debt. The effort pays off when systems need updates or modifications years later.
Evolution Capacity
Markets change, player preferences shift, and technology evolves. We build systems that can adapt to these changes without requiring complete rebuilds. This flexibility extends product lifecycles and protects operators' investments.
Knowledge Transfer
We create documentation and training that enables operators to manage systems independently over time. This reduces their ongoing costs and gives them control over their own operations rather than creating permanent dependencies.
Sustainable Growth
We design systems that scale with operator growth. Whether expanding from one venue to multiple locations or adding features over time, infrastructure should support evolution without requiring fundamental rebuilds that waste initial investment.
What This Means for You
Our philosophy translates into practical benefits for operators choosing to work with us.
Solutions built for your context: We adapt our approach to your specific markets, technical environment, and business model rather than offering predetermined packages.
Systems that work reliably: Our focus on real-world testing and operational practicality means fewer issues after deployment and more stable long-term performance.
Clear communication: We explain technical decisions in terms of operational impact and business outcomes, not development jargon. You understand what you're getting and why.
Growing independence: Our documentation and training help your team manage systems effectively, reducing dependence on external support for routine operations.
Interested in Working Together?
If our approach resonates with how you think about arcade operations, we welcome a conversation about your specific needs and context.
Start a Conversation